ECSAD Documents for review:

 

The ECSAD team is presently working on the final documents of Phase II.

This wiki can be used to centralize our internal icco-comments on these documents.

 

Below each document is presented, and a link to the file is provided. Next there is space for commenting. Please start with your initials or name, and close with a date, if you want to share an obsetvation or comment here.

 

1. Executive Summary that serves as an overall wrap up of the three case studies

1 Executive Summary impact partnerships.doc

 

Comments:

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

1a. Case study report: The Organic Fairtrade Mango Value Chain in Burkina Faso and Mali

1a Case Study Report Mangos ECSAD_ICCO_Phase III.pdf

 

Comments:

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

1b. Case study report: The Organic Fairtrade Cotton-Garment Value Chain in Burkina Faso

1b Case Study Report Cotton-Garment ECSAD_ICCO PHASE III.pdf

 

Comments:

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

1c. The Sorghum-Beer Value Chain in Ghana

1c Sorghum report draft3.pdf

 

Comments:

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

2. NGO-Private Sector Partnerships for Value Chain Development; The role of the private sector actor in partnerships

2 DRAFT report private sector ECSAD_ICCO PHASE III.doc

 

Comments:

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

3. 15 Dilemma’s for ICCO: NGO-Private Sector Partnerships for value chain development. Input for Partnership dilemma’s workshop

3 Dilemma's for ICCO 070409.doc (draft version)

Dillema's for ICCO (final version)

 

Comments:

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

4. Rough Guide 2009 (draft)

 

Comments:

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Comments by Jeroen van Wijk upon sending in these reports to ICCO:

The reports 1 and 2 are still drafts, we are awaiting feedback from stakeholders (e.g. from Ghana). We also want to get comments from ICCO staff, and they have to be corrected for grammar.

 

Furthermore we have been thinking how to present our research results in an interactive manner. We propose to hold "dilemma workshops", where we use the document under 3: 15 dilemma's for ICCO. We have elaborated 10 nof the 15, 5 are just an outline. Clkearly,m this can be a flexible document, where we can focus on the priority issues for participants, in view of the time available. New dilemma's can be added, old ones dropped. To make the document accessible, the format must be largely maintained: A documentr of maxim,um 20 pages, and 1 page per dilemma. The meetings must stimulate ICCO staff to use the Rough Guide and toi study the other underlying documents.

(Translated by RW)